Research Article

Comparative evaluation of chitosan-based biopolymer and conventional phosphorus extractants on phosphorus availability, soil pH dynamics, and maize agronomic performance in amended soils

Ganiyu Bankole1*, Adeoba Courage Aghorunse1, Festus Adelana2, Racheal Ayo Buzugbe2, Sheriff Adewuyi2, Jamiu Oladipupo Azeez3
1 Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta
2 Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
3 Department of Soil Science and Land Management,Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
* Corresponding author: bankolego@funaab.edu.ng
Published: Jun, 2026
DOI: 10.67042/njss.2026.hgzeomup
Pages: 222 - 241
Views: 145
Downloads: 51

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) availability in tropical soils is commonly restricted by strong fixation processes, mainly through adsorption onto iron and aluminum oxides and precipitation with calcium compounds, which significantly reduce its mobility and plant utilization. This study evaluated the effectiveness of chitosan-based biosorbents (nZvFe-CLCB) relative to conventional extractants (Bray-1 and Olsen) in assessing soil P availability, and their relationships with soil pH dynamics and maize performance under different P amendments. Soil samples from six locations in southwestern Nigeria were experimented under screenhouse conditions in a completely randomized design, with three treatments: single superphosphate (SSP), poultry manure (PM), and a control. Soil chemical properties, extractable P, electrical conductivity (EC), pH, maize dry matter weight (DMW), and P uptake were monitored over eight weeks after planting (WAP). Results showed Olsen extractant showed 11 to 15% higher P recovery than Bray-1 and nZvFe-CLCB in amended soils. Bray-1 extracted P was nZvFe-CLCB (0.732*) > Olsen (0.688*). Bray-1 had the strongest association with maize DMW (r² = 0.777*) and P uptake (r² = 0.820**), while soil pH had a strong influence on P availability across methods (up to r² = 0.851**). The finding concluded that nZvFe-CLCB extractant as an alternative extractant for Bray 1 in predicting plant-available P in tropical soils.

Keywords

Phosphorus availability; Chitosan biosorbent Soil pH dynamics. Maize productivity Tropical soils

References

  1. Aghorunse, A. C. Bankole, G. O. Odelana, T. B. Adewuyi, S. Adejuyigbe, C. O. and Azeez, J. O. (2023). Comparative evaluation of Fe-impregnated filter paper and conventional phosphorus extractants for assessing phosphorus availability in amended soils of southwest Nigeria. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 54, 1767–1787.
  2. Amarasinghe, T. Madhusha, C. Munaweera, I. and Kottegoda, N. (2022). Review on mechanisms of phosphate solubilization in rock phosphate fertilizer. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 53(8), 944–960.
  3. AOAC (2016). Official Methods of Analysis. 20th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA.
  4. Aranaz, I. Alcántara, A. R. Civera, M. C. Arias, C. Elorza, B. Heras Caballero, A. and Acosta, N. (2021). Chitosan: An overview of its properties and applications. Polymers, 13(19), 3256.
  5. Bray, R. H. and Kurtz, L. T. (1945). Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science, 59(1), 39–45.
  6. Butnariu, M. (2023). Biological and chemical aspects of chitosan. In Chitosan nanocomposites: bionanomechanical applications (pp. 27–54). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  7. Butnariu, M. (2023). Biological and chemical aspects of chitosan. In Chitosan nanocomposites: bionanomechanical applications (pp. 27–55). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  8. Crozat, S. J. DeSutter, T. M. Casey, F. X. M. and O'Brien, P. L. (2020). Phosphorus sorption and desorption in soils treated by thermal desorption. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 231(5), 216.
  9. Custos, J. M. Moyne, C. and Sterckeman, T. (2020). How root nutrient uptake affects rhizosphere pH: A modelling study. Geoderma, 369, 114314.
  10. Das, A. Ghosh, S. and Pramanik, N. (2024). Chitosan biopolymer nanocomposites for agricultural applications. In Biopolymeric Nanoparticles for Agricultural Applications (pp. 209–240). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  11. Desai, N. Rana, D. Salave, S. Gupta, R. Patel, P. Karunakaran, B. Sharma, A. Giri, J. Beniwal, D. and Kommineni, N. (2023). Chitosan: a potential biopolymer in drug delivery and biomedical applications. Pharmaceutics, 15(4), 1313.
  12. El Hadrami, A. Adam, L. R. El Hadrami, I. and Daayf, F. (2010). Chitosan in plant protection. Marine Drugs, 8(4), 968–987.
  13. Ge, X. Zhang, W. Wang, L. and Panno, C. Y. (2025). Dynamic phosphorus interactions at soil mineral-organic carbon interfaces: a critical review. Environmental Science & Technology, 59(50), 26980–26998.
  14. Gurmu, S. (2023). Review on effect of phosphorus fertiliser and its availability on growth and development of maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 13(4), 35–43.
  15. Gustafsson, J. P. Mwamila, L. B. and Kergoat, K. (2012). The pH dependence of phosphate sorption and desorption in Swedish agricultural soils. Geoderma, 189, 304–311.
  16. IITA (1979). Selected Methods for Soil and Plant Analysis. Manual Series No. 1. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria.
  17. Kacprzak, M. Malińska, K. Grosser, A. Sobik-Szołtysek, J. Wystalska, K. Dróżdż, D. Jasińska, A. and Meers, E. (2023). Cycles of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in poultry manure management technologies–environmental aspects. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 53(8), 914–938.
  18. Laan, M. Struwe, D. G. Kayler, Z. E. Cade-Menun, B. J. and Müller, G. (2024). Phosphorus availability and speciation in soils amended with upcycled dairy-waste nutrients. Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, 5, 1303357.
  19. Mahmood, M. Wang, J. Mehmood, S. Ahmed, W. Ayyoub, A. Sekiman, M. F. Eliya, A. S. Elnahal, A. S. Mustafa, A. Wei, X. and Li, W. (2025). Influence of drought stress on phosphorus dynamics and maize growth in tropical ecosystems. BMC Plant Biology, 25(1), 62.
  20. Mamun, S. A. Saha, S. Ferdous, J. Tushar, T. R. and Islam, M. S. (2022). Organic amendments for crop production, phosphorus bioavailability and heavy metal immobilisation: a review. Crop & Pasture Science, 73(8), 896–916.
  21. Mansab, S. Parveen, K. and Nasreen, S. (2025). Understanding soil composition: its effect on plant development. In Soils and Sustainable Agriculture: Interplay of Soil, Plant, Water and Environmental Systems for Sustainable Agriculture (pp. 27–55). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  22. Mehlich, A. (1984). Mehlich 3 soil test extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 15, 1409–1416.
  23. Mishra, G. Debnath, S. and Rawat, D. (2017). Managing phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystem: a review. European Journal of Biological Research, 7(3), 255–270.
  24. Ogwu, M. C. Patterson, M. E. and Senchuk, P. A. (2025). Phosphorus mining and bioavailability for plant acquisition: environmental sustainability perspectives. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197(5), 572.
  25. Olsen, S. R. Cole, C. V. Watanabe, F. S. and Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils. USDA Circular 939.
  26. Penn, C. J. and Camberato, J. J. (2019). A critical review on soil chemical processes that control how soil pH affects phosphorus availability to plants. Agriculture, 9(6), 120.
  27. Phiri, M. Mulder, J. Chishala, B. H. Chabala, L. M. and Martinsen, V. (2024). Phosphorus availability and uptake following a maize-pigeon pea rotation under conservation agriculture. Agronomy, 14(1), 169.
  28. Shen, J. Yuan, L. Zhang, J. Li, H. Bai, Z. Chen, X. Zhang, W. and Zhang, F. (2011). Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiology, 156(3), 997–1005.
  29. Solangi, F. Zhu, X. Khan, S. Rais, N. Majeed, A. Sabir, M. A. Iqbal, R. Ali, S. Hafeez, A. Ali, B. and Ercişli, S. (2023). The global dilemma of soil legacy phosphorus and its improvement strategies under recent changes in agro-ecosystem sustainability. ACS Omega, 8(26), 23271–23282.
  30. Wang, L. Li, Q. Zhai, S. Yu, S. Lu, Q. Zhang, Q. and Wang, J. (2025). Chitosan-modified biochar and root exudates of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) synergistically remediate cadmium-contaminated soil. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 47(12), 580.
  31. Wujcicki, Ł. and Kluczka, J. (2023). Recovery of phosphate (V) ions from water and wastewater using chitosan-based sorbents: A literature review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(15), 12060.
  32. Yalin, D. Borisover, M. Lavi, T. and Gérard, F. (2025). Standing on the shoulders of giants-what we should learn from past soil chemists to address the current challenge of "legacy phosphorus". Plant and Soil, 1–15.
How to Cite

Bankole, G., Aghorunse, A. C., Adelana, F., Buzugbe, R. A., Adewuyi, S., & Azeez, J. O. (2026). Comparative evaluation of chitosan-based biopolymer and conventional phosphorus extractants on phosphorus availability, soil pH dynamics, and maize agronomic performance in amended soils. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 35(1), 222 - 241. https://doi.org/10.67042/njss.2026.hgzeomup

G. Bankole, A. C. Aghorunse, F. Adelana, R. A. Buzugbe, S. Adewuyi, and J. O. Azeez, "Comparative evaluation of chitosan-based biopolymer and conventional phosphorus extractants on phosphorus availability, soil pH dynamics, and maize agronomic performance in amended soils," Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 222 - 241, June 2026. doi: 10.67042/njss.2026.hgzeomup

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF Back to Articles