Research Article

Evaluation of Some Sandstone Derived Soils of Southern Nigeria for Rubber (hevea Brasiliensis )cultivation

1 Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: orimoloyej@yahoo.com
Published: Aug, 2013
Pages: 252-263
Views: 453
Downloads: 555

Abstract

Some soils derived from crustaceous sandstones at Iyanomo, Edo State, Southern Nigeria were mapped, characterised and evaluated for rubber cultivation, using local, USDA Soil Taxonomy and FAO systems. Conventional parametric and non-parametric land suitability evaluation systems as well as weighted parametric approach in Geographic Information System (GIS) methods were used to generate suitability ratings for rubber cultivation. Dry rubber yield from existing plantations on the site obtained in the 2005/2006 and 2006/2007 cropping seasons were used to validate the suitability ratings. A total land area of 2070 ha was surveyed and the soils studied were classified as Alagba, Orlu, Kulfo and Ahiara series. The soils were in the Ultisol and Inceptisol soil orders of the Soil Taxonomy which covered 73.1 % and 26.9 % of the study area respectively. Parametric and non-parametric land suitability evaluation rated 73.1 % and 26.9 % of studied area as moderately suitable (S2) and marginally suitable (S3) respectively. The GIS method however rated 88.0 % of the site as highly suitable (S1) and 12.0 % as S2. Dry rubber yield obtained over a two year period correlated significantly (r = .929**) with the GIS suitability rating. Suitability evaluation using weighted parametric method in GIS was found to be better than conventional methods in rating the soils for rubber productivity and predicting yield of rubber.

References

  1. Aigbekaen, E. O. And Nwagbo, E. C. (1999) An analysis of costs and returns of natural rubber production in Nigeria. Indian Journal of Natural Rubber Research 12 (1&2): 77-85
  2. Ataga, D. O., Omoti, U. and Uzu, F. O. (1981). Management of the "acid sands" in Nigeria for tree crop production. In: E.J. Udoh & R. A. Sobulo (Eds), 'Acid sands' of Southern Nigeria. Soil Science society of Nigeria. Monogramme No 1, 86-150
  3. Black C.A. (1965) method of soil analysis Agronomy No 9 part 2 American society Agronomy Madison Wisconsin.
  4. Brady, N. C. (2002) The nature and properties of soils. Tenth Edition, Prentice-Hall of India. 621p.
  5. Cârstea, S. (2010). Pedogeographenetic and Pedomorphogenetic Concepts in Soil Surveys. IUSS Bulletin 116: 14-17ESRI 2008.
  6. Eshett, E. T. (1991). General properties of iron and aluminium status of selected rubber growing soils of Southern Nigeria. Indian Journal of Natural Rubber Research 4(1): 8-15.
  7. ESRI (2008). ArcGIS 9.3 Tutorials. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California.
  8. FAO (1990). Guidelines for soil profile description. Soil resources management and conservation service, FAO, Rome.
  9. FAO (2007). Land evaluation: towards a revised framework. Land and water discussion paper 6. FAO, Rome.
  10. FAO/IUSS (2006). World reference base for soil resources 2006. 2nd edition, World Soil Resources Reports No 103. FAO, Rome.
  11. Fapohunda, F. A. (1986). Variability studies on a soil map produced from remotely sensed data of the coastal plain sands of Ibadan, Nigeria. PhD Thesis, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
  12. Gee, G. W. and Or, D. (2002). Particle size analysis. In: Dane J.H. and Topp G.C. (Eds.). Methods of soil analysis, Part 4, Physical methods. Soil Science Society America Book series No. 5 ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. p 255-293.
  13. Grossman, R. B. and Reinsch, T. G. (2002). Bulk density and linear extensibility. In: Dane J.H. and Topp G.C. (Eds). Methods of soil analysis, part 4, physical methods, Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 5 ASA and SSSA Madison, WI. pp 201-228.
  14. Lin, H., Bourma, J., Wilding, J., Richardson, L., Kutilek, M and Nielson, D. R. (2005). Advances in hydropedology. Advances in Agronomy. (85): 1-89.
  15. Mc Bratney, A. B., Mendocasantos, M. L. and minasny, B. (2003). On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117: 3-52.
  16. Moss, R. P. (1957). Report of classification of soils formed over sedimentary rocks in Western Nigeria. Dep. Rep, MANR; Ibadan.
  17. Ogunkunle A. O. (1983). Updating the classification of acid sand soils with particular reference to the soils on the NIFOR main station. Journal for the Nigerian Institute for Oil Palm Research 6: 234-255.
  18. Ogunkunle, A. O. (1987). Soil resource inventory and agricultural productivity in Nigeria. Proceedings, National productivity workshop. Owerri, Dec. 1-3, 1987.
  19. Ogunkunle, A. O. (1993). Soil in land suitability evaluation: an example with oil palm in Nigeria. Soil Use and Management 9: 35-40.
  20. Ojanuga A. G., Lekwa, G. and Akamigbo, F. O. R. (1981). Survey, classification and genesis of acid sands. In: Acid sands of Southern Nigeria. SSSN Monograph No 1. Pp 1-18.
  21. Ojanuga A. G. (2006). Agro ecological zones of Nigeria manual (F. Berding and V. O. Chude: Eds) NSPFS/FAO/FMA&RD, Abuja, Nigeria. 128pp.
  22. Oluwatosin, G. A. and Ogunkunle, A. O. (1991). Suitability rating of some soils of the Savannah Zone of Southwestern Nigeria for rainfed maize. Nigeria Journal of Soil Science 10: 1-24.
  23. Rezaei, S. A. and Gilkes, R. J. (2005). The effects of landscape attributes and plant community on soil chemical properties in rangelands. Geoderma 125: 167-176.
  24. Rossiter, D. G. (1996). A theoretical framework for land evaluation. Geoderma 72: 165-190
  25. Saraswathyama, C. K., Licy, J. and Marattukalam, J. G. (2000). Planting materials, In; George, P. and Kuruvilla Jacobs, C. (Eds). Natural rubber: Agromanagement and crop processing. Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam, India. Pp 59-74.
  26. Senjobi, B. A. (2001). Parametric and conventional approaches for soil potential evaluation in three ecological zones of Southern Nigeria. Moor Journal of Agricultural Research 2: 91-102.
  27. Smyth, A. J. and Montgomery, R. F. (1962). Soils and land use in central Western Nigeria. Government Press, Ibadan. 265.
  28. Soil Survey Staff, (2010). Keys to soil taxonomy (Eleventh Edition). USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
  29. Sys, C. (1985). Land Evaluation. International Training Centre for postgraduate soil Scientists Vol I & II. State University, Ghent.
  30. Thapinta, A and Hudak, P. F. (2003). Use of Geographic Information Systems for assessing groundwater pollution potential of pesticides in central Thailand. Environmental International 29: 87-9.
  31. Van Ranst, E, Tang, H., Groenemans, R. and Sinthura, S. (1996). Application of fuzzy logic to land suitability for rubber in Peninsular Thailand. Geoderma 70: 1-19.
  32. Vine, H. (1954). Latosols of Nigeria and some related soils. Proceedings of 2nd Inter-African Soils conference. Pp 295-308.
  33. Walkey, A., and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of Detjareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37:29-38.
  34. Watson, G. A. (1989). Nutrition: Rubber. C.C. Webster and W.J.Baulkwill (Eds). Longman Scientific and Technical, New York.
  35. Wear, J..I and Sommer, A.L. (1948). Acid extractable zinc of soils in relation to the occurrence of zinc deficiency symptoms of corn: A method of analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 12:143- 144.
  36. Wilding, L.P. and Lin, H. (2006). Advancing the frontiers of soil science towards geosciences. Geoderma 131: 257-274.
How to Cite

R., O. J., & E., A. G. (2013). Evaluation of Some Sandstone Derived Soils of Southern Nigeria for Rubber (hevea Brasiliensis )cultivation. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 23(2), 252-263. https://doi.org/10.67042/njss.2013.so1drbt8

O. J. R., and A. G. E., "Evaluation of Some Sandstone Derived Soils of Southern Nigeria for Rubber (hevea Brasiliensis )cultivation," Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 252-263, August 2013. doi: 10.67042/njss.2013.so1drbt8

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn