Research Article

Geospatial Distribution of Soil Reaction in Central Southeastern Nigeria

1 Department of Soil Science and Technology, School of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri.
2 Department of Soil Science and Technology, Federal University of Technology, P.M.B 1526,Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria
3 Department of Soil Science and Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri
4 Department of Soil Science and Technology, Federal University of Technology, P.M.B. 1526, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.
* Corresponding author: onyechere.adaobi@gmail.com
Published: Aug, 2022
Pages: 111-116
Views: 487
Downloads: 670

Abstract

The study applied Geographic Information System (GIS) in the Study of Soil Acidity Distribution in Soils of Central Southeastern Nigeria from six different parent materials, namely Imo Clay Shale, Ajali Sandstone, Asu River group, Afikpo Sandstone, Ogwashi-Asaba formation and Bende Ameki formation. Free soil survey method was used to site the eighteen profile pits investigated. The pits were geo-referenced with a hand held Global Positioning System (GPS) Receiver. Routine laboratory analyses were conducted on soil samples from the field study. Microsoft Excel was used to analyse the mean and percentage coefficient of variation of the results. Geostatistical Wizard of Arc GIS 10.2 software was used for the descriptive statistics, semivariogram and cross validation. Ordinary kriging method was also performed for interpolation and developed into attribute maps. The average pH in water was highest in soils formed on Asu river group (6.04-7.14) and lowest in soils formed on Ogwashi-Asaba formation and Bende-Ameki formation (5.47-6.48). The geostatistical analysis revealed that there was high spatial variability of soil properties analysed at different geographical scales however, the soil analysed showed moderate spatial dependency. The Gaussian model gave the best fitted model for the semivariogram presenting a semi variance with lowest nugget and highest spatial autocorrelation. The result of the cross validation showed that the models made a moderate prediction for pH. The map revealed that soil pH followed an observable pattern with soils of Anambra State being more acidic (lower pH level) when compared with the soils of Enugu and Ebonyi State.

References

  1. Ahukaemere, C.M., Onweremadu, E.U., Ndukwu, B.N. and Nkwopara, U.N., 2016. Properties of Soils of Contrasting Lithosequences in South-Eastern Nigeria. Futo Journal Series 2(1): 48 – 56.
  2. Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R., 2002. The Nature and Properties of Soils 13th Edition. Pearsons Education Inc. Prentice Hall, New Delhi.
  3. Cambardella, C.A., Moorman, T.B., Novak, J.M., Parkin, T.B., Karlem, D.L., Turco, R.F., Konopka, A.E. 1994. Field scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soil. Soil Science Society of American Journal., 58: 1501–1511.
  4. Egede, E., 2013. Threats and Mitigation of Soil Erosion and Land Degradation in Southeast Nigeria. Journal of Environment and Earth Science 3(13): 95-102.
  5. ESRI, 2020. ArcGIS Resources, Retrieved from https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/geostatistical-analyst/performing-cross-validation-and-validation.
  6. Hendershot, W.H., Lalende H. and Duquette M. 1993. Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity in sampling and methods of Soil Science, Lewis productions, London. pp 142-145.
  7. Kent, A. J. and Vujakovic, P. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Mapping and Cartography. Abingdon Routledge. ISBN 9780367581046.
  8. Landon, J.R. 1991. Booker Tropical Soil Manual. A Handbook for Soil Survey and Agricultural Land Evaluation in the Tropics and sub Tropics. Longman Scientific & Technical Publ., Harlon.
  9. Maliene V., Grigonis V., Palevicius V., and Griffiths S. 2011. Geographic information system: Old principles with new capabilities. Urban Design International. 16 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1057/udi.2010.25. S2CID 110837951.
  10. Nielsen D.R. and Wendroth O. 2003. Spatial and temporal statistics—sampling field soils and their vegetation. Catena Verlag GMBH, Reiskirchen.
  11. Nottidge D. O., Balogun R. B., and Njoku N. R. 2009. Effect of Rice-Husk Ash on Exchange Acidity, Growth and Yield of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) in an Acid Ultisol. Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(1): 1 – 6.
  12. Obalum S.E. and Chibuike G.U. 2017. Air-drying Effect on Soil Reaction and Phosphorus Extractability from Upland-lowland Soils as Related to their Colloidal Stabilizers. Journal of Ecology and Environmental Research, 15 (1): 525-540.
  13. Onweremadu E. U., Osuji G. E., Eshett E. T., Opara C. C and Ibeawuchi, I. I. 2007. Characterization of Soil Properties of Owner Managed Farms of Abia and Imo State, for Sustainable Crop Production in Southeastern Nigeria. Journal of American Science. 3(1): 28 – 37.
  14. Onweremadu E. U. 2022. Sustainable Soil Management Practices for Problematic Soils of Southeast, Nigeria. Including Manual on Good Agricultural Practices (GAP), Sustainable Soil Management Practices for Problematic Acidic Soils and Use of Soil Test Kit Boxes for farmers and Field/Zonal/State Agricultural Officers. NISS, Southeast Zone, UNN. pp 53-63.
  15. Ripendra A., Mohammad S., Farhat A., Samiur F., Sanjit K. D., Amjad A. and Ali F. 2019. Soil Physical Properties Spatial Variability under Long-Term No-Tillage Corn Production. Agronomy, 9(750): 1– 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110750.
  16. Skye A.W., 2005. The spatial distribution of soil properties and prediction of soil organic carbon in Hayden Prairie and an adjacent agricultural field. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Iowa State University, Iowa. Unpublished.
  17. Wang, S., Zhuang, Q., Jia, S., Jin, X., and Wang, Q. 2018. Spatial Variations of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in Coastal Hilly Area of China. Geoderma, 314: 8–19.
  18. Webster R., Oliver M.A., 2007. Geostatistics for environmental scientists, 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc. Chichester, England.
How to Cite

U, O. A., U, O. E., N, A. B., & C.M., A. (2022). Geospatial Distribution of Soil Reaction in Central Southeastern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 32(2), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.67042/njss.2022.j395c7go

O. A. U, O. E. U, A. B. N, and A. C.M., "Geospatial Distribution of Soil Reaction in Central Southeastern Nigeria," Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 111-116, August 2022. doi: 10.67042/njss.2022.j395c7go

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn