Research Article

Microplastic Contamination Alters Soil Hydraulic Properties and Inhibits Maize Growth: A Factorial Assessment Across Contrasting Soil Textures.

EJI EJOR TANGBAN1*, OGUIKE, P. C.2, NNAJI, G. U.3, BENJAMIN, J. I.3
1 University of Cross River State, Calabar, Nigeria
2 4Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Department of Soil Science and Land Resources Management, College of Crop and Soil Science.
3 Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Department of Soil Science and Land Resources Management, College of Crop and Soil Science.
* Corresponding author: ejiejortangban@gmail.com
Published: May, 2026
DOI: 10.67042/njss.2026.azj0vlth
Pages: 257 - 275
Views: 126
Downloads: 54

Abstract

Microplastic pollution in agricultural soils constitutes an emerging threat to food security, yet the interactive influence of soil texture and contamination intensity on crop productivity remains inadequately characterized. A 3 × 4 factorial pot experiment was conducted under controlled conditions at Bendeghe Ekiem, Cross River State, Nigeria, to evaluate the combined effects of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) microplastic contamination at four levels (0, 1, 5 and 10 g/kg) across three contrasting soil textures (Sandy Loam, Loamy Sand and Sandy Clay Loam) on selected soil hydraulic properties and the early growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Soil samples were collected from 0–15 cm depth, air-dried, sieved (2 mm) and characterized using standard laboratory procedures, while water retention parameters were derived using SPAW Hydrology software (version 6.02.74). Maize growth indices (plant height, stem girth, fresh biomass and leaf number) were recorded at four weeks after planting, and data were subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment means separated using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at p < 0.05. Significant soil type × contamination level interactions were observed for permanent wilting point (LSD = 1.77), field capacity (LSD = 4.41), available water (LSD = 0.027), saturated hydraulic conductivity (LSD = 22.6) and hydraulic conductivity (LSD = 3.16 × 10⁻⁶). Sandy Loam recorded a 2.8-fold higher hydraulic conductivity (3.27 × 10⁻⁶ mm/hr) than Loamy Sand (1.17 × 10⁻⁶ mm/hr). Maize growth was significantly suppressed in Sandy Clay Loam (plant height = 27.55 cm; stem girth = 4.56 mm; biomass = 0.61 g) relative to Sandy Loam and Loamy Sand (p < 0.05). Interestingly, the highest contamination level (10 g/kg) produced increased stem girth (6.26 mm) and leaf number (7.61), suggesting possible adaptive responses or modifications in soil–plant water relations. The findings indicate that microplastic contamination disrupts soil hydraulic functioning in a texture-dependent manner, with finer-textured soils being more vulnerable to growth suppression. The non-linear dose–response pattern observed implies complex underlying mechanisms warranting further molecular-scale investigation. The study underscores the necessity for texture-specific soil quality thresholds in regulatory frameworks aimed at managing agricultural microplastic pollution in Nigeria and similar tropical agroecosystems.

Keywords

Microplastics soil texture hydraulic conductivity Zea mays water retention soil–plant interactionsinteractions.

References

  1. Bengough, A.G., Mckenzie, B.M., Hallett, P.D., and Valentine, T.A. (2011). Root elongation, water stress, and mechanical impedance: a review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(1), 59-68. [https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq350](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq350)
  2. Blake, G.R. (1965). Bulk density. In C.A. Black (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Properties (pp. 374-390). American Society of Agronomy.
  3. Blanco-Canqui, H. (2017). Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81(4), 687-711. [https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017](https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017)
  4. Boots, B., Russell, C.W., and Green, D.S. (2019). Effects of microplastics in soil ecosystems: above and below ground. Environmental Science and Technology, 53(19), 11496-11506. [https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03304](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03304)
  5. Bouyoucos, G.J. (1963). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal, 54(5), 464-465.
  6. Calabrese, E.J., and Baldwin, L.A. (2003). Hormesis: the dose-response revolution. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 43, 175-197. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.140223](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.140223)
  7. Çakir, R. (2004). Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research, 89(1), 1-16. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.005](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.005)
  8. Cozar, A., Echevarria, F., González-Gordillo, J.I., et al. (2014). Plastic debris in the open ocean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(28), 10239-10244.
  9. Danielson, R.E., and Sutherland, P.L. (1986). Porosity. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1—Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd ed., pp. 443-461). American Society of Agronomy.
  10. Day, P.R. (1965). Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In C.A. Black (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 (pp. 545-567). American Society of Agronomy.
  11. de Souza Machado, A.A., Kloas, W., Zarfl, C., Hempel, S., and Rillig, M.C. (2018). Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 24(4), 1405-1416. [https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14020](https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14020)
  12. de Souza Machado, A.A., Lau, C.W., Kloas, W., et al. (2019). Microplastics can change soil properties and affect plant performance. Environmental Science and Technology, 53(10), 6044-6052. [https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01339](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01339)
  13. Fei, Y., Huang, S., Zhang, H., et al. (2020). Response of soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities to the accumulation of microplastics in an acid cropped soil. Science of the Total Environment, 707, 135634. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135634](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135634)
  14. Hillel, D. (1982). Introduction to Soil Physics. Academic Press.
  15. Horn, R., and Smucker, A. (2005). Structure formation and its consequences for gas and water transport in unsaturated arable and forest soils. Soil and Tillage Research, 82(1), 5-14.
  16. Horton, A. A., Walton, A., Spurgeon, D.J., Lahive, E., and Svendsen, C. (2017). Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Science of the Total Environment, 586, 127-141. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190)
  17. Huang, Y., Liu, Q., Jia, W., Yan, C., and Wang, J. (2020). Agricultural plastic mulching as a source of microplastics in the terrestrial environment. Environmental Pollution, 260, 114096. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114096](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114096)
  18. Jiang, X., Chen, H., Liao, Y., et al. (2019). Ecotoxicity and genotoxicity of polystyrene microplastics on higher plant Vicia faba. Environmental Pollution, 250, 831-838. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.055](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.055)
  19. Lehmann, A., Fitschen, K., and Rillig, M.C. (2019). Abiotic and biotic factors influencing the effect of microplastic on soil aggregation. Soil Systems, 3(1), 21. [https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems3010021](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems3010021)
  20. Liu, E.K., He, W.Q., and Yan, C.R. (2014). 'White revolution' to 'white pollution'—agricultural plastic film mulch in China. Environmental Research Letters, 9(9), 091001. [https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/091001](https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/091001)
  21. Machado, A.A., Zarfl, C., Rehse, S., and Kloas, W. (2019). Low density polyethylene fragments and the oxidative stress response of Danio rerio. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 38(4), 852-859.
  22. Maity, S., Chatterjee, A., Guchhait, R., De, S., and Pramanick, K. (2021). Cytogenotoxic potential of a hazardous material, polystyrene microparticles on Allium cepa L. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 406, 124323.
  23. Nigerian Meteorological Agency (2020). Annual Climate Report 2019. Federal Ministry of Aviation, Abuja.
  24. Nizzetto, L., Futter, M., and Langaas, S. (2016). Are agricultural soils dumps for microplastics of urban origin? Environmental Science and Technology, 50(20), 10777-10779. [https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04140](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04140)
  25. Peth, S., Horn, R., Beckmann, F., Donath, T., Fischer, J., and Smucker, A.J. (2008). Three-dimensional quantification of intra-aggregate pore-space features using synchrotron-radiation-based microtomography. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 72(4), 897-907.
  26. Phogat, V., Mahadevan, M., Skewes, M., and Cox, J.W. (2015). Modelling soil water and salt dynamics under pulsed and continuous surface drip irrigation of almond and implications of system design. Irrigation Science, 34(4), 315-333.
  27. Potters, G., Pasternak, T.P., Guisez, Y., Palme, K.J., and Jansen, M.A. (2007). Stress-induced morphogenic responses: growing out of trouble? Trends in Plant Science, 12(3), 98-105.
  28. Qi, Y., Yang, X., Pelaez, A.M., et al. (2020). Macro- and micro-plastics in soil-plant system: effects of plastic mulch film residues on wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth. Science of the Total Environment, 645, 1048-1056.
  29. R Core Team (2022). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [https://www.R-project.org/](https://www.R-project.org/)
  30. Rillig, M.C. (2012). Microplastic in terrestrial ecosystems and the soil? Environmental Science and Technology, 46(12), 6453-6454. [https://doi.org/10.1021/es302011r](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1021/es302011r)
  31. Rillig, M.C. (2018). Microplastic disguising as soil carbon storage. Environmental Science and Technology, 52(11), 6079-6080.
  32. Rillig, M.C., Ziersch, L., and Hempel, S. (2017). Microplastic transport in soil by earthworms. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1362.
  33. Rillig, M.C., Lehmann, A., de Souza Machado, A.A., and Yang, G. (2019). Microplastic effects on plants. New Phytologist, 223(3), 1066-1070. [https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15794](https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15794)
  34. Ritchie, S.W., Hanway, J.J., and Benson, G.O. (1993). How a Corn Plant Develops. Special Report No. 48. Iowa State University Cooperative Extension Service.
  35. Saxton, K.E., and Rawls, W.J. (2006). Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70(5), 1569-1578. [https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117)
  36. USDA (1993). Soil Survey Manual. Handbook No. 18. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
  37. Uzoekwe, S.A., and Achudume, A.C. (2011). Pollution status and particle size distribution of heavy metal contaminated soil from auto-mechanic workshops in Benin City, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 15(2), 297-300.
  38. VSN International (2020). GenStat for Windows (21st ed.). VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
  39. Weil, R.R., and Brady, N.C. (2016). The Nature and Properties of Soils (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
  40. Zhang, G.S., Zhang, F.X., and Li, X.T. (2019). Effects of polyester microfibers on soil physical properties: perception from a field and a pot experiment. Science of the Total Environment, 670, 1-7. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.149](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.149)
How to Cite

TANGBAN, E. E., C., O. P., U., N. G., & I., B. J. (2026). Microplastic Contamination Alters Soil Hydraulic Properties and Inhibits Maize Growth: A Factorial Assessment Across Contrasting Soil Textures.. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 35(1), 257 - 275. https://doi.org/10.67042/njss.2026.azj0vlth

E. E. TANGBAN, O. P. C., N. G. U., and B. J. I., "Microplastic Contamination Alters Soil Hydraulic Properties and Inhibits Maize Growth: A Factorial Assessment Across Contrasting Soil Textures.," Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 257 - 275, May 2026. doi: 10.67042/njss.2026.azj0vlth

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF Back to Articles