Research Article

Responses of Maize Growth and Grain Yield to Different Sources and Time of Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer

Omisore J. K.1*, Y. A. Abayomi2
1 National Centre for Agricultural Mechanization P. M.B 1525 Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.
2 Department of Agronomy, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara State Nigeria.
* Corresponding author: omisorejk@soilsjournalnigeria.com
Published: Aug, 2016
DOI: 10.67042/njss.2016.jxs961ip
Pages: 41-51
Views: 443
Downloads: 551

Abstract

Soil fertility decline has been identified as one of the major biophysical constraints affecting agriculture in the sub Saharan Africa, including Nigeria. Even though, the use of chemical fertilizer is the most convenient way of improving soil fertility, the high cost and poor distribution of chemical fertilizer have made the commodity inaccessible to resource poor farmers. Consequently, there is a negative balance in nutrient budgets of soils in the country. Ironically large amount of organic wastes abound that can be turned into fertilizers for crop production at possibly low cost. However, the extent to which different type and form of organic sources of N fertilizer could be used for sustainable crop production has not been adequately evaluated in Nigeria. This study was therefore designed to evaluate the responses of maize (Zea mays L) to different types and forms of organic manure as sources of N applied at different periods of crop growth. Field experiments were conducted over two cropping seasons at the National Centre for Agricultural Mechanization Research Farm Ilorin, using a Randomized Complete Block Design arranged as a 7 x 4 factorial combinations with 3 replications. The treatments consisted of 7 sources of N fertilizer combined with 4 different time of application. An improved open- pollinated maize variety (TZEE-SR-Y) was used for the experiment and data were collected on growth and yield parameters, including grain yield. All data collected were analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significant means were separated with the least significant difference (LSD) method at five percent probability level. Results of the study showed that the application of the inorganic source of N (urea) was superior to all types and forms of the organic sources on all growth, yield components and grain yield, suggesting that the application of sole organic sources of N may not be adequate for optimum grain yield. The best grain yield was obtained with the application of fertilizer at 4 WAP, depending on the source, with most sources producing the best yield with application at 4 WAP, while cow dung showed the best yield with application at the planting of maize. The post crop harvest soil properties (Soil pH, total N and organic matter contents) were better with the application of any type and form of organic N sources, indicating probable long term sustainability of crop production. In conclusion, the sole use of organic sources of N in the evaluated rate may not be adequate for optimum crop yield. Nevertheless the long run sustainability of crop production may be better.

Keywords

application fertilizer responses different

References

  1. Abayomi, Y. A. (2004). Interactive effects of water stress and nitrogen application on growth and yield of hybrid maize varieties. 66- 80.
  2. Abayomi, Y. A. and G. A. Adedoyin (2004). Effects of planting date and nitrogen fertilizer application on growth and yield of contrasting maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes II:Morpho-physiological growth characteristics and their contribution to grain yield. Nigerian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 19:1641-1652.
  3. Abayomi, Y. A., T. V. Ajibade, O. F. Samuel and B. F. Sa’adudeen (2008).Growth and yield responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) genotypes to nitrogen fertilizer (NPK) application in the southern Guinea Savanna zone of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 7(2): 170 – 176.
  4. Abou El-Magd, M. A., E. El Bassiony and Z. F Fawzy (2006). Effect of organic manure with or without chemical fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of some varieties of Broccoli plants. Journal of Applied Science Research, 2(10). 791 – 798.
  5. Abou El-Magd, M. M., M. A. Hoda and Z.F. Fawzy (2005). Relationship, growth yield of Broccoli with increasing N, P or K ratio in a mixture of NPK fertilizers. Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor, 43 (2):791 – 805.
  6. Ademoroti, C. M. A. (1996). Solid wastes reclamation, recycling and reuse: In: Environmental chemistry and toxicology Foludex Press, Ibadan, pp. 67 – 72
  7. Alasiri, K.O. and O. O. Ogunkeye (1999). Effect of different levels of poultry manure on seed yield of okra. Proceedings 25th Annual Conference of Soil Science Society of Nigeria, 21st – 25th November, 1999 Benin Nigeria.
  8. Aune, J. B. and R. Lal (1995). Tropical soils productivity calculator: A model for assessing effects of soil management on productivity: In: Soil Management Experimental basis for sustainability and Environment Quality Lal R and B, Stewart (Eds). Adv. Soil Sci. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton , pp 499 – 520.
  9. Ayube, M., A. Tanveer., K. Mahmud, A. Ali and M. Azam (1999). Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on the fodder yield and quality of two sorghum cultivars (Sorghum bicolor L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 2(1): 247–250.
  10. Azraf-ul-Haq, A., I. Qadir and N. Mahmood (2007). Effect of integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers on fodder yield of sorghum. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science, 44(3): 416-421.
  11. El- Shakweer, M. H. A., E. A. El sayed and M. S. A. Ewees (1998).Soil and plant analysis as a guide for interpretation of the improvement efficiency of organic conditioners added to different soils, in Egypt. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 29: 2067- 2088.
  12. Enwezor, W. O., E. J. Udo, N. J. Usoroh, K. A. Ayotade, J. A. Adepetu, V. O. Chude and C.I. Udegbe (eds) (1989). Fertilizer Use and Management Practices for crops in Nigeria (Series No.2). Produced by the Fertilizer Procurement and Distribution Division of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Resources and Rural Development,Lagos, Nigeria.
  13. Gaur, A. C. (1982). Review of soil research in India. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Soil Science, New Delhi. Pp 278-305.
  14. Ginting, D., A. Kessavalou, B. Eghball and J. W. Doran (2003). Greenhouse gas emissions and soil indicators four years after manure compost applications. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32:23-32.
  15. Hadjichristoudoulou, A. (1987). Stability of performance of cereals in low rainfall areas as related to adaptive traits. In: Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals (Eds J. P. Strivastava; E. Porceddu; E. Acevedo and S. Varma) pp 191-200. Wiley Interscience, New York. (ICARDA).
  16. Kassam, A. H and J. M Kowal (1973) Productivity of crops in the savanna and rain forest zones in Nigeria. Savanna, 2 (1): 39 – 49.
  17. Klinkinberg, M and G. W. Higgins (1968). An outline of Northern Nigerian soils. Nigerian Journal of Science 2:91-115.
  18. Loria, E.R., J. E. Sawyer, D. W. Barker, J. P. Lundvall and J. C. Lorimor (2007). Use of anaerobic digested swine manure as a nitrogen source in corn production. Agronomy Journal 99:1119-1129.
  19. Makinde E. A., A. A. Agboola and F. I. Oluwatoyinbo (2001). The effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the growth and yield of maize in a maize/melon intercrop. Moor Journal of Agricultural Research, 2:15-20.
  20. Mallory, E. B. and T. S. Griffin (2007). Impacts of Soil amendment history on nitrogen availability from manure and fertilizer. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 71:964 -973.
  21. Maroko, J. B., R. J. Buresh and P. C. Smithson (1998). Soil nitrogen availability as affected by fallow maize systems on two soils in Kenya. Biology, Fertilizer and Soils, 26:229-234.
  22. Mohammed, S.A.S., A Ewees, A, Sawson, E. Y. Scaf and M. S. Dalia (2008). Improving maize grain yield grown on a newly reclaimed sandy soil by applying micro nutrients organic manure and biological inoculation. Research Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 4: 537 – 544.
  23. Omisore, J. K. (2014). Response of maize (Zea mays, L) to organic and inorganic fertilizer in southern Guinea Savanna, Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis, UNILORIN, Nigeria. Pp. 100.
  24. Singh, A., R. J. Carsky, E. O. Lucas and Danshiel, L. (2001). Grain yield response of maize to previous crop and residue management in the Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. In: Badu – Apraku, B., M. A. B. Fakorede., M. Quedraogo and R. J. Casky (eds). Impact, Challenges and Prospects of maize Research and Development in West and Central Africa. Proceedings of a Regional Workshop, IITA – Cotonu, Benin Republic, 4 – 7 May 1999: pp 214-224.
  25. Smil, V. (2000). Phosphorus in the environment. Natural flows and human interferences. Annual preview at energy and environment 25: 53- 88
  26. Thomsen, I. K. (2005). Crop N utilization and leaching losses as affected by time and method of application of farmyard manure. European Journal of Agronomy, 22:1-9.
  27. Titiloye, E. O. (1982). The chemical composition of different sources of organic wastes and their effects on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L). Ph. D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Nigeria pp. 316.
  28. Uhart, S. A. and Andrade, F. H. (1995). Nitrogen deficiency in maize I:Effects on crop growth, development, dry matter partitioning and kernel set. Crop Science 35:1376-1383.
  29. Van Es, H. M., J. M. Sogbedji and R. R. Schindelberg (2006). Effect of manure application timing , crop and soil type on nitrate leaching. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35:172-182.
How to Cite

K., O. J., & Abayomi, Y. A. (2016). Responses of Maize Growth and Grain Yield to Different Sources and Time of Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 26(2), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.67042/njss.2016.jxs961ip

O. J. K., and Y. A. Abayomi, "Responses of Maize Growth and Grain Yield to Different Sources and Time of Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer," Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 41-51, August 2016. doi: 10.67042/njss.2016.jxs961ip

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF Back to Articles