Research Article

Use of a GIS-Based AHP and Parametric Square Root Method for Land Suitability Assessment of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) on Gurumpawo Toposequence

1 Department of Soil Science & Land Resources Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Taraba State University, Jalingo, P.M.B. 1167, Jalingo
2 Ahmadu Bello University
3 Department of Geography and Environment Management, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria
4 Department of Soil Science, Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria
* Corresponding author: gisilanbe27poksman@gmail.com
Published: Jun, 2026
Pages: 354 - 382
Views: 39
Downloads: 16

Abstract

This study assessed the cultivation potential of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) along Gurumpawo toposequence, Ganye, Adamawa State, using the parametric square root method (SRM) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Sustainable groundnut production in the area is threatened by declining soil fertility and topographic variability, while site-specific suitability information for precision land management remains inadequate. In addition, limited studies have compared the performance and spatial reliability of conventional parametric and multi-criteria decision models for groundnut suitability assessment across the toposequence. This study determined selected soil properties and compared the spatial outputs of SRM and AHP models for sustainable land-use planning. A digital elevation model was used to delineate crest, upper, middle, and lower slopes, as well as floodplain units within a 100 ha landscape using ArcGIS 10.7.1. Soil samples were analyzed for texture, pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, available phosphorus, total nitrogen, cation exchange capacity, and base saturation. Suitability assessment was conducted using SRM based on profile data, whereas AHP utilized auger-based spatial datasets. Spatial comparisons of suitability class geometries and area coverage were performed on ArcGIS, and the agreement between the two models was tested using Pearson’s Chi-square (X2). Soils across the toposequence were characterized by low fertility, with organic carbon (

References

  1. Abate, S.G., Anteneh, M.B. (2024). Assessment of agricultural land suitability for cereal crops based on the analysis of soil physico-chemical characteristics. Environmental Systems Research, Vol. 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-024-00333-y.
  2. Ajibade, T.B., Ajibade, E.T., Salami, M.F. and Balogun, A.M. (2023). Groundnut value chain in Nigeria: Positioning to alleviate supply chain crisis in global edible oil markets [Conference paper]. AAEA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/335960.
  3. Akpoti, K., Kabo-bah, A.T. and Zwart, S.J. (2019). Agricultural land suitability analysis: State-of-the-art and outlooks for integration of climate change analysis: Agric. Syst. Vol. 173. Pp. 172-208.
  4. AmdeMichael, G.G. (2024). Soil Characterization, Land Use Types and Effects of Liming and Phosphorus on Selected Soil Properties and Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield in Tiro Afeta District of Jimma Zone, South-West Ethiopia. http://ir.haramaya.edu.et/hru/handle/123456789/8127.
  5. Animashaun, I.M., Adetunji, S.A., Mohammed, A.S., Abdullah, M.B., Ogunrinde, A.T. and Mosa, A.A. (2026). A GIS-based multicriteria analysis of land suitability for groundnut and maize crops in Niger East, Niger State, Nigeria. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, Vol. 28(1): pp. 231-246. https://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounral/article/view/9837.
  6. Beretta, A.N., Silbermann, A.V., Paladino, L., Torres, D., Bassahun, D., Musselli, R. and Garcia-Lamohte, A. (2014). Soil texture analyses using a hydrometer: Modification of the Bouyoucos method. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria, Vol. 41(2), pp. 263-271. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-16202014000200013.
  7. de Camargo, M.C.M., Zarnaz, J.S., Fortes, G.M., Soares, M.F., Tura, E.F., Winck, J.E.M., da Silva, M.R., Zanon, A.J. and Streck, N.A. (2025). Assessing soil mechanical resistance at different depths and compaction mapping at effective root zone. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 105: Pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2024-0005.
  8. Diallo, M.D., Wood, S.A., Diallo, A., Mahatma-Saleh, M., Ndiaye, O., Tine, A.K., Ngom, T., Guisse, M., Seck, S., Diop, A. and Liasse, A. (2016). Soil suitability for the production of rice, groundnut, and cassava in the peri-urban Niayes zone, Senegal. Soil and Tillage Research, Vol. 155, pp.412-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.09.009.
  9. Dimkpa, C., Adzawla, W., Pandey, R., Alakera, W.K., Kouame, A.K., Jemo, M. and Bindraban, P.S. (2023). Fertilizers for food and nutrition security in sub-Saharan Africa: An overview of soil health implications. Frontiers in Soil Science. Pp. 1-18. 3:1123931.doi: 10.3389/fsoil.2023.1123931.
  10. Douzouné, K., Oloukoi, J., Gengnet, E.E. and Affossogbe, T.S.A. (2024). Application of Ordinary Kriging in Mapping Soil Organic Carbon in Chad using SoilGrids data. South African Journal of Geomatics, Vol. 13(2). Pp. 397-408. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v13i2.11.
  11. Ernoji, W., Barakat, A., El Baghdadi, M., Oumenskou, H., Aadraoui, M., Karroum, L.A. and Hilali, A. (2018). GIS-based multi-criteria land suitability analysis for sustainable agriculture in the northeast area of Tadla plain (Morocco). J Earth Syst Sci, Vol. 127(6), P. 79.
  12. FAO. (1976). A framework for land evaluation. FAO Soils Bulletin 32. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  13. FAO. (2006). Guidelines for Soil Description (4th Ed.) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 97 pp.
  14. FAO (2022). Food and Agricultural Commodities Production. Retrieved March 30, 2022, from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
  15. Gambo, A., Fullen, M.A. and Baldwin, T.C. (2025). Characterization and classification of soils on a toposequence around Dutse, Jigawa State, Nigeria. Discover Soil, Vol. 2(1), 97. Pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-025-00126-4.
  16. Godfrey, O., Ibyinka A., and Grace, Y. (2020). Economics of Groundnut Production in/Kumbotso Local Government Area of Kano State, Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), Vol. 4 (9), 65-69.
  17. Hegde, R., Bhaskar, B.P., Niranjana, K.V., Ramesh Kumar, S.C., Ramamurthy, V., Srinivas, S. and Singh, S.K. (2017). Land evaluation for groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production in Pulivendula tehsil, Kadapa district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Legume Research, Vol. 42(3), pp. 326-333.
  18. Jayasree, B., Naidu, M.V.S., Madhavi, K.V.N., Bhaskar, B.P., Sagar, G.K. and Kumari, P.L. (2022). Soil-Site Suitability Evaluation for Major Crops Grown in Part of Palamaner Division in Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh, India. The Pharma Innovation Journal. Vol. 11(8): pp. 731-734.
  19. Juita, N., Mubarak, H., Wijaya, E., Fadhila, E. and Alim, N. (2023). Land suitability analysis for cocoa development based on square root. In H. Mubarak, A. R. Ramli, Muhyidin, A. S. Arifin, G. Hardiansinta, M. Rizal, A. Rois, A.S.R. Hutraus, N.D. Rahmatika, M.A. Anshari, S.H. Hidayat, D.S. Yolanda, A.F. Ainani, I. Kamaruddin, & Kasmira (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Unhas International Conference on Agricultural Technology, UICAT 2021 Article 080004 (AIP Conference Proceedings; Vol. 2596). American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0118799.
  20. Juita, N., Ridwan, I., Jannah, R. and Parahyianti, A.A.M. (2021). Arabica coffee land suitability with a parametric approach based on square root. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 807(2), 022076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/807/2/022076.
  21. Kahsay, A., Haile, M., Gebremedhin, G. and Mohammed, M. (2018). GIS-based multi-criteria model for land suitability evaluation of rainfed tef crop production in degraded semi-arid highlands of northern Ethiopia. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. Vol. 4(4). Pp. 1467-1486.
  22. Li, Q., Huang, J., Wang, C., Lin, H., Zhang, J., Jiang, J. and Wang, B. (2017). Land development suitability evaluation of Pingtan island based on scenario analysis and landscape ecological quality evaluation. Sustainability, Vol. 9(7), p. 1292.
  23. Linn, H. (2020). Assessment of land suitability for agriculture using FAO and AHP frameworks in the dry zone of Mandalay Region, Myanmar (Doctoral dissertation). https://www.searca.org/pubs/abstracts-theses-dissertations/database/view?docid=1443.
  24. Maniyunda, L.M. and Ya’u, S.L. (2023). Evaluation of Land Suitability for Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Production on Selected Soils across Niger State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Soil and Environmental Research Vol. 22. Pp. 266-271.
  25. Meena, R.L., Verma, T.P., Singh, R.S., Tailor, B.L. and Singh, S.K. (2017). Soil-Site Suitability Evaluation for Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in Western Saurashtra Region of Gujarat, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. ISSN: 2319-7706. Vol. 6 (10). pp. 3074-3083.
  26. Moisa, M.B., Merga, H.H., Gabioua, B.T. and Gemeda, D.O. (2022). Assessment of land suitability for oilseeds crops (sesame and groundnut) using geospatial techniques: In the case of Diga district, East Wollega zone, western Ethiopia. Oil Crop Science, Vol. 7 (3), Pp. 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocsci.2022.08.001.
  27. Naidu, L.G.K., Ramamurthy, V., Challa, O., Hegde, R. and Krishnan, P. (2006). "Manual Soil-Site Suitability Criteria for Major Crops". National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning (NBSS & LUP), NBSS Publ. No. 129, NBSS&LUP, Nagpur. Pp. 8-38.
  28. Nelson, D.W. and Sommers, L.E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 chemical and microbiological properties, 9, 539-579. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29.
  29. Njoki, L., Okoth, S., Wachira, P., Ouko, A. and Kagot, V. (2024). Status of Groundnut Production in Africa: A Review From 2012 to 2022. Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 16 (10), Pp. 50-64. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v16n10p50.
  30. Nwaoba, O.W., Nsor, M.E., Adesemuyi, E.A. Chukwu, G.D. (2024). Classification and Suitability Evaluation of Soils of Nkpa, Bende LGA, Abia State Nigeria for Maize (Zea mays L.) and Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) Cultivation. Nigeria Agricultural Journal, Vol. 55(2), Pp. 93-108. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/naj/article/view/287425.
  31. Osinuga, O.A., Alhosi, V.U. and Oyegoke, C.O. (2020). Classification and Suitability Evaluation of Soils Along a Toposequence for Rice Production in Alabata, Southwest Nigeria. Agro-Science: Journal of Tropical Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension, Vol. 19(4), pp. 43-50.
  32. Osujieke, D.N., Moga, S., Ahagyeh, S.O.J., & Ugese, F.D. (2022). Land Suitability Evaluation for the production of Maize (Zea mays) and Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using parametric and nonparametric methods in Mambilla Plateau, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 32(2), 33-41.
  33. Regassa, A., Kibret, K., Selassie, Y. G., Kiflu, A. and Tena, W. (2023). Soil properties. In The Soils of Ethiopia (pp. 111-156). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  34. Rilwani, M.L. and Ikhuoria, I.A. (2011). Prospects for geo-informatics-based precision farming in the Savanna River basin, Nigeria. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 32(12), pp. 3539-3549. doi:10.1080/01431161.2010.523022.
  35. Roy, J. and Saha, S. (2018). Assessment of land suitability for the paddy cultivation using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): A study on Hinglo river basin, Eastern India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. Vol. 4(2). Pp. 601-618.
  36. Saaty, T.L. (1977). “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.” J Math. Psychol., vol. 15, pp. 234–281, 1977.
  37. Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (2001). "Models, methods, concepts, and applications of the analytic hierarchy process". Boston etc., Kluwer Academic, pp. 333.
  38. Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (2012). The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process. In Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process (pp. 23-40). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  39. Sadiq, F.K., Ya’u, S.L., Aliyu, J. and Maniyunda, L.M. (2023). Evaluation of land suitability for soybean production using GIS-based multi-criteria approach in Kudan Local Government area of Kaduna, State Nigeria. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 20, (2023). 100297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100297.
  40. Salifu, E., Aggare, W.A. and Abdulganiyu, S. (2022). Evaluation of Land Suitability for Crop Production in Northern Ghana Using GIS and AHP Based Techniques. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Vol. 9(4), Pp. 46-56. Doi:10.30897/ijegeo.1022275.
  41. Shah, F. and Wu, W. (2019). Soil and crop management strategies to ensure higher crop productivity within sustainable environments. Sustainability, Vol. 11(5):1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051485.
  42. Shobayo, A.B. and Hussaini, G.M. (2020). Soil Suitability Evaluation of Selected Zaria Soils for Cassava Production. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension. Vol. 23(1). pp. 9-18. DOI:10.4314/as.v23i1.2.
  43. Singha, C. and Swain, K.C. (2016). Land suitability evaluation criteria for agricultural crop selection: A review. Agricultural Reviews. Vol. 37(2), pp.125-132.
  44. Sreekumar, V.B., and Sanil, M.S. (2021). Teak biology and ecology. In The Teak Genome (pp. 67-81). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  45. Surwase, S.A., Singh, S.K., Reddy, G.P., Kadu, P.R., Mohokar, D.S., Naitam, R.K., Konda, N.M., Aage, A.B. and Deshmukh, P.S. (2023). Characterization and classification of soils in a toposequence of the Semi-arid basaltic landscape of Western India. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 35(19), 876-887.
  46. Sys, C. (1993). Land Evaluation in the Tropics, Pedologie, XLIII-1, pp 117-142.
  47. Sys, C., Van Ranst, E., Debaveye, J. (1991). Land Evaluation. Part I: principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. Agricultural Publications nr. 7, GADC, Brussels, Belgium, 1991.
  48. Tadesse, M. and Negese, A. (2020). Land suitability evaluation for sorghum crop by using GIS and AHP techniques in Agamia sub-watershed, Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture, Vol. 6 (1). Pp. 1-18. 1743624, DOI:10.1080/23311932.2020.1743624.
  49. Thomas, G.W. (1996). Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods of soil analysis: part 3 chemical methods, 5, pp.475-490. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16.
  50. Tukur, K.A., Alwadood, J.A., Ihenacho, M.N., Nasir, A.A., Koptur, E.P., Oduh, A.A., Nwagwu, N.G., Ipanja, S.A., Ibrahim, V.A., Ahmad, B., Jackson, E.R., John, J.A., Amodu, P.O., Musa, R., Ezerike, C.E. and Ikwue, S.A. (2024). Land variability mapping for groundnut production in southern region of Borno state, Nigeria. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, Vol. 22(01), pp. 1961-1971. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.1.2163.
  51. Zha, X., Yi M., An Z., Li K. Evaluating land capability using site assessment and land evaluation model in GIS in a watershed scale. Sci Rep 2025 May 22; Vol. 15(1):17767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95586-7. PMID: 40404954; PMCID: PMC12098702.
  52. Ziadat, F.M. (2010). Land Suitability Classification for Major Crops in the Northern Jordan Valley using a Parametric Approach. Soil Science, Vol. 175(8). Pp. 388-397.
  53. Zolekar, R.B. (2018). Integrative approach of RS and GIS in characterization of land suitability for agriculture: A case study of Danti catchment. Arab. J. Geosci. Vol. 11(24). P. 780.
How to Cite

Adamu, G. S., Babatunde, A. S., Lawan, S. Y., ISMAIL, M., Maniyunda, L. M., Aliyu, J., Ahmad, H. A., & ZUBAIRU, U. S. (2026). Use of a GIS-Based AHP and Parametric Square Root Method for Land Suitability Assessment of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) on Gurumpawo Toposequence. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 35(1), 354 - 382. https://doi.org/10.67042/njss.2026.n5mhkxud

G. S. Adamu, A. S. Babatunde, S. Y. Lawan, M. ISMAIL, L. M. Maniyunda, J. Aliyu, H. A. Ahmad, and U. S. ZUBAIRU, "Use of a GIS-Based AHP and Parametric Square Root Method for Land Suitability Assessment of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) on Gurumpawo Toposequence," Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 354 - 382, June 2026. doi: 10.67042/njss.2026.n5mhkxud

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn