Research Article

Yield Decline Trends of Eroded Ultisols in Owerri, Southeastern Nigeria: Maize Response to Artificial Erosion

Published: Apr, 2015
Pages: 20-30
Views: 480
Downloads: 662

Abstract

The artificial incremental removal of surface soil to varying depths to simulate erosion followed by subsequent evaluation of crop growth and performance under uniform management is a common agronomic technique to study erosion/soil productivity relationships. However, because its results tend to exaggerate yield decline rates it is being replaced by the more complex erosion phase approach. This paper is part of a series of elaborate studies conducted between 1996 and 2002 to document erosion induced productivity decline in Ultisols of Southeastern Nigeria. Specifically, it evaluated the impact of mechanical topsoil removal, in 1998 and 1999 cropping seasons on maize yield performance and compares the two methods of assessment. Three levels of topsoil removals (2.5, 5.0, 7.5 cm) were imposed on the non-eroded reference plateau of the erosion phase experiment reported in the paper I. Topsoil removal led to significant increases in bulk density, 1.64 Mgm-3 where 7.5 cm of topsoil was removed, 1.5 and 1.47 Mgm where 2.5 and 5.0 cm were removed respectively, 1.44 Mgm-3 in undisturbed plots. Declines in exchangeable acidity (from 3.4 Cmol/kg in control plots to 2.8 Cmol/kg in plots where 2.5 cm of top-soil was excavated) were observed in 1999. Significant reductions in soil organic carbon, by as much as 47% in all desurfaced plots, and available P (27.05 Mg/kg in 0 cm and 11.90 Mg/kg in the other treatments) were recorded. In both cropping seasons, artificial soil loss effects on maize yield parameters were significantly affected. Most yield variables were similar among the 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 cm depths of desurfaced plots. However, significantly higher values were obtained in the undisturbed sites in the order 0>2.5≥5.0≥7.5 cm depths of topsoil removal. Relative grain yields in 1999 were in the other 100:41:9:6 for 0:2.5:5.0:7.5 cm depths of soil lost. The corresponding values were 5.18 t, 2.03 t, 0.48 t and 0.29 t/ha respectively. There was total crop failure in 1998 in plots from which more than 2.5cm of topsoil was excavated. Leaf Area Index (LAI) an indicator of canopy cover and photosynthetic efficiency was also negatively impacted by incremental soil loss. The shelling ratio (SR) was not affected by simulated erosion. The desurfacing technique exaggerated the magnitude of maize yield decline by a factor of 4. The erosion phased approach is recommended.

References

  1. Bachtell et al. 1956 Bachtell, M. A. , C. J. Willard and G. S. Taylor, (1956). Building fertility on exposed subsoil. Ohio Agr. Expt. Station Res. Bull. 782. P 35.
  2. Blake, G. R. and Hartge, K. H. (1986). Bulk density. In A. Klute (Ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. ASA monograph 9: 363 – 375.
  3. Bouyoucos, G. J., (1926). Estimation of the colloidal material in soils. Science 64: 362.
  4. Bray, R. H. and Kurtz, L. T. 1945. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 59: 39– 41.
  5. Day, P. R. (1956). Report of the committee on physical Analyses. 1954 – 55. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 20: 167 –169.
  6. den Biggelaar, C.D., Lal, R., Wiebe, K and V. Breneman. (2004). The Global Impact of Soil Erosion on Productivity. Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 81. Academic Press DOI
  7. Dregne, H. E. (1990). Erosion and soil productivity in Africa. J. Soil Water Cons. 45:431-436.
  8. Gollany, H. T., T. E. Schumacher, M. J. Lindstorm, P. D. Evenson, and G. D. Lemme. (1992). Topsoil depth and desurfacing effects on properties and productivity of a Typic Argiustoll. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56:220-225.
  9. Kemper, W. D. and R. C. Roseneau. (1986). Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Methods of Soil analysis. Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. ASA– SSSA. Madison, Wisc.
  10. Klute, A. and C. Dirksen. (1986). Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: laboratory methods. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Physical and Mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. ASA– SSSA. Madison, Wisc.
  11. Lal, R. (1976a). Soil erosion on Alfisols in western Nigeria. V. The Changes in physical Properties and the response of crops. Geoderma 16: 419 – 431.
  12. Lal, R. (ed.). (1979b). Soil tillage and crop production Proc.. Series 2.Int. Tropical Agr., Ibadan, Nigeria. p361.
  13. Lal, R. (1985a). Soil erosion and sediment transport research in tropical Africa. Hydrological Sci. J. 30:239-242.
  14. Lal, R. (1985b). Soil erosion and its relation to productivity in tropical soils. In W. C. Moldenhauer, S. A. El-Swaify, and Andrew L. (eds.). Soil Erosion and Conservation. Soil Cons. Soc. Am. Ankeny, Iowa, p237-247.
  15. Lal, R. (1994). Global overview of soil erosion. In: Soil and Water Science: Key to understanding our global environment. SSSA Spec. Publ. Madison, U.S.A.
  16. Lal, R. (1995). Erosion crop productivity relationship for soils of Africa. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59: 661 - 667.
  17. Langdale, G. W., J. E. Boy Jr., R. A. Leonard, A. P. Barnett, and W. G. Fleming. (1979). Corn yields reduction on eroded southern Piedmont soils. J. Soil Water Cons. 34: 226-228.
  18. Lindstorm, M. J., T. E. Schumacher, G. D. Lemme, and H. M. Gollany. (1986). Soil characteristics of a mollisol and corn (Zea mays L.) growth 20 years after topsoil removal. Soil Tillage Res.7: 51-62.
  19. Mbagwu, J. S. C., R. Lal, and T. W. Scott. (1984a). Effects of desurfacing Alfisols and Ultisol in southern Nigeria. I. Crop performance. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48 :828- 833.
  20. Mbagwu, J. S. C., R. Lal, and T. W. Scott. (1984b). Effects of desurfacing Alfisols and Ultisols in southern Nigeria. II. Changes in soil physical properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48: 834- 838.
  21. Miller, M. H. (1976). Soil erosion in Ontario. A report for the Ontario. Soil Mgt. Res. Committee, Land Resource Science, Univ. of Guelph, Ontario.
  22. Oti, N. N, N Ozara and J.O Ajayi. (1999). The impact of erosion on soil properties and yield attributes of cowpea in Southeastern Nigeria. Journal of Erosion and Envir Degrad. (JEED) 1: 135 – 147
  23. Oti N.N, G.E. Osuji, Mbagwu, J.S.C. (2007). Models for erosion induced yield decline in tropical ultisols. Int. J. Agric. And Rural Development. 10: 183 – 187
  24. Page, A. L., Miller, R. H and D. R. Keeney. (eds.) (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2 – Chemical and Microbiological properties 2nd Ed. ASA – SSSA. Agron. No. 9.
  25. Pierce, F. J. 1991. Erosion productivity impact prediction. In: soil management for sustainability, R. Lal and F. J. Pierce (eds.). Pp35- 52.
  26. Rehm, S. (1978). Land development in the humid tropics. In: International Symposium for Agron-Mechanisierung der Dtsch. Landwirtsch. Ges. Frankfurt.
  27. Sadler, J. M. (1980). Effects of Soil degradation under intensive potato production on soil productivity. Agron. Abst. 1980. P 191.
  28. Stocking, M. (1984). Erosion and soil productivity. A review. Soil Conservation Program, Land and Water Development Division. AGLS, FAO. Consultants Working Paper No. 1.
  29. Thompson, A. L., C. J. Gantzer, and S. H. Anderson. (1991). Topsoil depth, fertility, water management, and weather influences on yield. Soc.Sci. Am. J.55: 1085- 1091.
  30. Unamba – Oparah, I. (1985). Potassium status of the sandy soils of northern Imo State, Nigeria. J. of Soil Science. 139: 437– 445.
  31. Van Bavel, C. H. M. (1949). Mean weight diameter of soil aggregates as a statistical index of aggregation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc: 14: 20 – 23.Walkley – Black, 1934
  32. Yoder, R. E. 1937. The significance of soil structure in relation to the tilth problem. Soil Sci 36 Soc. Am. Proc. 2: 21 – 23.
  33. Youker, R. E. and J. L. McGuiness. (1956). A short method of obtaining mean weight diameter values of aggregate analyses of soils. J. Soil Sci. 83: 291 - 294.
How to Cite

Oti, N. N. (2015). Yield Decline Trends of Eroded Ultisols in Owerri, Southeastern Nigeria: Maize Response to Artificial Erosion. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 25(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.67042/njss.2015.s0nb95er

N. N. Oti, "Yield Decline Trends of Eroded Ultisols in Owerri, Southeastern Nigeria: Maize Response to Artificial Erosion," Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 20-30, April 2015. doi: 10.67042/njss.2015.s0nb95er

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn