Yield Response of Maize (zea Mays L.) and Soil Nutrients to Time and Methods of Npk Application
1 Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences University of Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: bosundare@soilsjournalnigeria.com
* Corresponding author: bosundare@soilsjournalnigeria.com
Abstract
A study was carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm of the University of Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria, during early 2008 and 2009 cropping seasons to determine the effects of time and methods of NPK fertilizer application on yield of maize (Zea mays L.) and soil nutrients. The design was split – plot, laid out in a Randomized Complete Block, with three replicates. Time of NPK fertilizer application constituted the main – plot treatments, while the method of NPK fertilizer application was the sub-plot treatment. The main-plot treatments were: no fertilizer application (NFA) i.e. control, single early application (SEA) at four weeks after planting (WAP), two split applications (SA), with half applied at 4 WAP, and the rest half at 8 WAP and single late application (SLA) at 8 WAP. The methods of NPK fertilizer application were band placement and broadcast methods. The results indicated that there were significant (P – 0.05) differences between the two treatments as regards their effects on yield and yield components of maize. The percentage decreases in soil organic carbon (SOC), adduced to time of NPK fertilizer application were 38, 44, 48 and 40 for NFA, SEA, SA and SLA respectively. SLA resulted in a 60% increase in total N, contrasting decreases of 36, 26 and 29% for NFA, SEA and SA respectively. Similarly, SLA resulted in a 62% increase in available P, as against decreases of 26, 16 and 21% for NFA, SEA and SA respectively. Time of NPK fertilizer application significantly (P = 0.05) increased maize grain yield from 2.79 t ha-1 for NFA to 4.15, 4,43 and 3.13 t ha-1 for SEA, SA and SLA, respectively. Band placement of NPK fertilizer gave 4.10 t ha-1 maize grain yield, which was significantly higher than 3.75 t ha-1 obtained for the broadcast method counterpart.
Keywords
yield
time
method
fertilizer
soil
nutrients
References
- Adenle, D. E. (2010). The role of Organic matter in sustainable arable farming systems in the tropics. Soil Fertility and Land Development, 21: 82-87.
- Adepetu, S.S. (2007). Growth and yield response of maize to tillage practices and NPK fertilization. Crop Science Journal, 12 (10): 71-76
- Awodun, M.A. and Olafusi, R.A. (2007). Effects of integrated application of goat manure and urea on soil nutrient content and yield of okra. Nigeria Journal of Soil Science, 17:126-129.
- Beadle, D.K. (2003). Studies on the effects of different fertilizer application methods on maize grain yield. Crop physiology, 14:12-17.
- Boyer, O.N. (2009). Effects of timing of NPK Fertilizer application and sowing methods on growth and yield of maize. Plant Nutrition, 16 (14) 100-105.
- Bouyoucos, G. J. (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer method of mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 43: 434-438.
- Fondufe, E. Y. (1995). Assessment of different fertilizer models for application under different cropping systems. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. 282 pp.
- Kemper, T. A. (2010). Soil nutrient content and maize yield as affected by methods of NPK fertilizer application under different irrigation regimes. Soil Science, 20:200-206
- Kang, B.T. (2009). Effects of band placement of urea and different weeding regimes on growth and yield attributes of maize. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 10:11-16.
- Mahal, A.S. (2008). Soil nutrient status and maize yield as affected by plant residues and methods of NPK fertilizer application of NPK fertilizer application. Journal of Food and Agricultural Science, 17 (13): 70-75.
- Mclean.E.O. (1965). Aluminium. In: C.A. Black (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Agronomy No 9 Part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, P. 78-998.
- Morr, B.B. (2010). Methods and timing of nitrogen fertilizer application on maize grain yield and major soil nutrients. International Journal. of Pure and Applied Science, 21:8-14.
- Nyende, P., J.S. Tenywa, J. Oroyokot and Kidoido, M. (2001). Weed profiles and management assessment for increase finger millet production in Uganda. African Crop Science Journal, 9 (3): 507-516.
- Ologunja, K. O. (2006). Comparative effects of different fertilizer application methods on maize yield, weed biomass and soil nutrient content. Soil fertility and Fertilizer Research, 15:201-207.
- Rissa, R.A. (2007). Improvement of soil fertilizer through application of plant and animal wastes. Organic Agriculture, 18:6-11.
- Robinson, C. A., Cruse, R. M. and Kohler, K.A. (1994). Soil Management. In: Hatfield, J. L; Karlean, D.L. (eds). Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Lewis Publisher, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 109-134.
- Soil Survey Staff (SSS) (2002). Keys to soil taxonomy, SMSS Tech. Monograph (8th edition). National Resource Conservation Services. USDA.
- Tankou, L.M. (2004). The role of organic and inorganic fertilizers in soil fertility improvement and crop production. Experimental Journal of Crop and Soil Science, 26:113-119.
How to Cite
Osundare, B. (2011). Yield Response of Maize (zea Mays L.) and Soil Nutrients to Time and Methods of Npk Application. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 21(2), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.67042/njss.2011.ecp9a0f3
B. Osundare, "Yield Response of Maize (zea Mays L.) and Soil Nutrients to Time and Methods of Npk Application," Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 95-101, August 2011. doi: 10.67042/njss.2011.ecp9a0f3
